Public Safety. Financial Stability. Our Community’s Future.
What makes Palos Verdes Estates special?
Palos Verdes Estates is not a typical city.
- A master-planned coastal community designed to preserve open space and natural beauty
- A city that prioritizes residential character over commercial development
- A community that maintains its own police department and funds essential services locally
- A city that allocates 28% of its acreage to protected open space
- A city that lacks major commercial, hotel, or rental revenue
What makes PVE special—its location, design, and independence—also creates unique financial challenges.
Why We Are at a Crossroads?
For years, the City has relied on voter-approved parcel taxes to help fund public safety:
- Measure D failed in 2017
- Measure E passed in 2018 and expires June 30, 2027
Measure E helped preserve local police services—but it didn't adequately fund PVE's financial requirements.
It was set at a level believed most likely to pass the two-thirds approval requirement under Proposition 13.
- No cost-of-living adjustment
- Flat revenue since 2018
- Expenses growing ~5% annually
The result: a growing gap between revenue and reality
The Financial Reality
Palos Verdes Estates faces:
- Structural operating deficits
- Pension obligations that fluctuate with market performance
- Approximately $80 million in infrastructure needs (next 10 years)
- Limited revenue flexibility due to Proposition 13
- Minimal commercial tax base
At the same time, PVE:
- Maintains its own police department
- Pays directly for fire and paramedic services
- Has increased costs associated with maintaining 28% of the City’s acreage as open space.
Higher responsibilities with fewer revenue tools
Not All Cities Are the Same
Nearby cities like Rancho Palos Verdes, Rolling Hills Estates, and
Rolling Hills
- Receive a lower share of property taxes
- But don't pay for County-funded fire services
If PVE operated under that same model:
It would save approximately $2.5 million annually
Comparisons without this context are misleading
The Decision Before Voters
Measure PF — $16.25 Million
- Citizen-led initiative
- Dedicated to police, fire, and emergency services
- Requires only a simple majority to pass
Benefits:
- Fully funds essential services
- Stabilizes City finances
- Reflects current cost realities
A Critical Juncture
Measure PF is different.
· It is citizen-led
· It requires only a simple majority (50% + 1)
This allows voters to decide based on what the City actually needs, not what might clear an artificial supermajority threshold.
Why Waiting Is Risky
Opponents say there is more time.
But history shows the risk:
- Measure E was a compromise based on what might pass under Prop 13
- It created today’s funding gap
- Creates another year of depleting reserves
- Creates another year of not addressing infrastructure
Looking ahead:
A proposal supported by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association on the November 2026 ballot could eliminate citizen-led initiatives like Measure PF.
If that happens:
Future measures would again require two-thirds approval
The City could be forced to ask for less than what is needed
We risk repeating the same mistake
“No Plan”? The Facts
Opponents claim the City has no plan.
That is not accurate.
- The City is legally restricted from advocating or detailing spending tied to a ballot measure
- However, it has extensively documented its needs during City Council meetings and Town hall discussions. All of the following are available on the City's website:
- Budget presentations
- Financial outlooks
- Infrastructure plans
- Pension analyses
The constraint is legal—not a lack of planning
Why Public Safety Comes First
Police and fire services are:
- Essential
- Ongoing
- Non-negotiable
They must be fully funded before addressing other priorities.
Let’s Learn from History — Not Repeat It
Measure E was:
- Set below actual need
- Not indexed for inflation
- A product of a two-thirds constraint
It created a growing gap
Measure PF gives us the opportunity to:
- Align funding with reality
- Fully fund essential services
- Break the cycle of underfunded solutions
The Bottom Line
Palos Verdes Estates is unique.
- Unique in its beauty
- Unique in its structure
- Unique in its financial challenges
The choice is clear:
Continue a cycle of underfunding
or
Get it right this time
Protect Public Safety. Plan for the Future.